Shaping Growth in the University District

September 12th, 2016

Today the City of Seattle released a proposal to shape housing and job growth in the University District equitably and affordably. The proposal combines changes to land use regulations, like zoning and development standards, with City investments in open space, transportation, and social services to reflect the community’s priorities which have been expressed over five years of community input. The passage of these changes will be our first opportunity to implement the Mandatory Housing Affordability program which will require all new development to include or fund new affordable housing units for the first time in our City’s history.

The proposed zoning changes here in the University District are the result of a five year process which has involved over 90 meetings and hundreds of participants. I want to thank everyone who, through their hard work and their feedback, has gotten us to this critical milestone today.

The University District is a thriving and asset rich neighborhood in our city. The neighborhood’s local businesses contribute to strong employment opportunities and represent the foundation of its unique character. The students, faculty, and staff of the University bring a vibrant diversity to the community, and we’ve made incredible transit investments that people are clamoring to utilize.

We all know how quickly our city is growing. Recently we’ve been adding 35 new jobs and welcoming 50 new neighbors a day. Unfortunately, we have only been adding 12 housing units a day, which increase housing costs and contribute to displacement.

Without a proactive, comprehensive strategy for the University District’s growth we risk losing what makes it so special. We need to keep this neighborhood affordable both for residents and our locally owned businesses. And we need to ensure our neighborhood’s faith-based communities and our social service organizations can stay here.

I look forward to working with the Mayor’s office to ensure that we are implementing his commercial affordability task force recommendations in this legislation to ensure that the University District remains supportive of small, locally owned businesses.

The strides we make in allowing for increased growth also must be matched by city funded capital investments in our schools, parks, open spaces, transportation choices, and community based organizations to ensure our livability keeps pace.

For example UHeights needs funding for a new roof to ensure it remains a safe gathering space for the thousands of community members who participate in their programs, and ROOTS needs more funding for case workers to help homeless youth find employment.

Without these critical upzones, displacement is the unfortunate reality, occurring as we speak. Just last week, I spoke to a resident whose rent increased by a prohibitive $350 a month. Every rent increase of $100 results in an increased percentage in economic displacement with far reaching impacts on our community.

The proposed zoning changes the Mayor will transmit does not represent the singular fix-all solution to respond to our city’s growth, but these changes will certainly lead to more production, and when combined with Mandatory Housing Affordability will yield more critically important funding for affordable housing.


Here’s to the Start of a Successful School Year

September 7th, 2016

Many kids throughout Seattle woke up this morning welcoming their first day of school. And as I watched my daughters fill their backpacks and walk into their kindergarten classroom for the first time, I couldn’t help but reflect on this milestone in their lives and how they will be shaped by the Seattle Public School system. Although there are many pressing and timely decisions facing the Council right now (which will undoubtedly be topics of blog posts to come), I want to briefly shift that focus to commemorate the start of the school year for all of the students in this city – from our preschoolers up to our high school seniors.

We have two exciting achievements to celebrate today as students return to school. First, building upon a successful 2015/2016 pilot year that served 280 students in 15 classrooms, Seattle’s Preschool Program (SPP) kicks off its second academic year today serving an impressive 600 kids in 32 schools.

In order to maintain the high-quality standards of the program and facilitate SPP’s expansion across the city, today’s roll out features a few changes that have taken effect this school year, including:

  • Raising the payments to our early learning providers by an average of 21 percent;
  • Expediting the curriculum waiver process;
  • Updating the student selection process to be more “parent friendly;”
  • And allowing providers who serve targeted populations to reserve a select number of spaces in their classroom to enroll on their own.

These changes were made after hearing directly from those who administer and participate in SPP and help us get closer to our ultimate goal of closing the opportunity gap for so many of our kids.

Second, I want to celebrate the great news regarding smaller class sizes. In the last few days, five brand new schools have come online and will welcome their inaugural classes today. Thanks to these critical openings and funding from the Legislature’s 2016 budget process, our kindergarten through third grade students will benefit from the increased attention and guidance smaller class sizes provide.

Lastly, I will work to ensure we maintain our partnerships with Seattle Public Schools and identify new ones to keep accessible childcare a priority for our office. Before and aftercare represents a critical piece of the puzzle that sets students and their families up for success and accessible opportunities make a huge impact on the achievement gap our City works so hard to close.

Here’s to a successful school year for all of Seattle’s students, families and administrators!


My Thoughts on the North Precinct

August 18th, 2016

On Monday, the Council took action on a resolution regarding the North Precinct, a proposed new facility that would serve most of the residents of District 4. Though much as been made of previous Council discussions on the project, I’ve heard from many constituents that they want to build the new precinct, but that the cost is too high.

During Monday’s discussion, I wanted to avoid “green-lighting” a hard number for the Precinct but did want to gather additional information to make a sound decision. The resolution that was adopted accomplished these goals. Although the real funding decisions ultimately will be made during the budgeting process, I worked to assure that this was expressly spelled out in the resolution. As such, our work on the North Precinct will continue from September through November as we find ways to keep costs down.

Staff at Finance and Administrative Services (FAS) and Seattle Police Department (SPD) have indicated that the design of the precinct is in response to several needs, chief among them being that this facility contains crucial training spaces that SPD needs to remain compliant with the federal consent decree on police use of force and bias free policing. On the other hand, we’ve had lots of public feedback regarding the North Precinct, receiving hundreds upon hundreds of phone calls and emails over the last month and a half, and I’d like to recognize the organizing efforts of the many community based organizations for showing up consistently, making their voices heard, and demanding that we provide additional scrutiny and a new evaluative lens to $160M worth of policing infrastructure.

After hearing multiple points of view, I’ve come to the conclusion that regardless of where you may stand on policing issues, a new precinct at $160M or even $149M is far too large a sum for one building.

As we’ve engaged in conversations and briefings with SPD and FAS as to how and why this project has gone from $88M to more than $160M then through value engineering revised down to $149M, I’ve been frustrated by the difficulty of getting the project costs down. This is why I added language to Section 1 that calls for an additional third-party cost estimation, with that third-party to be selected in consultation with Council. This separate estimation, combined with the use of the City’s Racial Equity Toolkit, will provide Council with crucial information to make a much more well-informed decision for what type of funding will need to be appropriated during the Budget season.

Additionally, as I mentioned this Monday morning during Council Briefing – as a new council member, I’ve been taken aback by the significant cost overruns in several City capital projects:

  • Spending for the Seawall Project is scheduled for an additional $40M in 2016 and $31M in 2017 – $71M over a project originally estimated and advertised to voters at $300M in 2012.
  • Spending for the New Customers Information System by Seattle City Light and Seattle Public Utilities is scheduled for an additional $43M in spending over the approved project budget of $66M in the 2015 Adopted Budget.
  • And, according to a Seattle Times column published in October of last year, the 2003 Fire Levy was $109M over an estimated $197M budget.

In response, Councilmember Herbold and I issued a press release calling for the creation of a new City Capital Projects Oversight Committee. This committee would share characteristics with capital oversight best practices, such as creating a series of systematic check-ins as projects progress, both through planning and construction. Using Sound Transit as an example, I appreciate that as they develop their projects, staff seeks Board authorization at eight points throughout the process, including for preliminary engineering, final design, and baseline budget, which includes total project costs and construction.  The goal of this proposed oversight committee would be to establish a baseline of transparency to help ensure City capital projects – such as the Seawall and North Precinct – remain on time and within budget.

Transparency should be the name of the game as we develop our capital facilities. As a Seattle City Councilmember, I expect the public to hold me accountable for delivering our capital projects on time and within budget, but we need the tools necessary for proper oversight. If City facilities are projected to run over-budget, the Council should have plenty of lead time to develop alternatives or contingencies.

When it comes to the North Precinct, I am looking forward to reviewing the findings of our third party consultant and of the Racial Equity Toolkit. I think these are all necessary and important steps for this project that must be incorporated into any final budgetary decisions. I appreciate the work of my colleagues (particularly Councilmember González) and community activists in shaping the discussion over the past few weeks and months – and hope to continue dialogue with all those wanting to speak out about this project.


Affordable Housing for Every Neighborhood

August 2nd, 2016

Today is a very big day for the Planning, Land Use & Zoning committee, as we will vote to send our Mandatory Housing Affordability – Residential (MHAR) framework to Full Council for consideration on Monday, August 15, 2016. As our city continues to grow I believe this framework will help make our city more affordable to people of all walks of life. I anticipate today’s conversation to focus on proposed amendments to the program, three of which I will be bringing to the Committee discussion. These three amendments reflect and respond to some of what I’ve heard out in the community, as I knocked on doors during campaign season, as I have attended neighborhood council meetings throughout my district and across the city, and as I have received comments from folks who took the time to mail, phone, or visit City Hall.

My first amendment proposes more reporting and accountability; I believe we need more review at earlier stages so we can have the flexibility to make changes down the road if things need to be fixed or updated. My second amendment adds specific criteria considering that housing built with payments will be located near market rate housing to ensure we benefit from affordable housing in all our neighborhoods. And my third amendment increases the terms of affordability specifically for units built on site from 50 to 75 years.

Councilmembers Lisa Herbold and Mike O’Brien, my fellow colleagues on the Planning, Land Use & Zoning Committee, will also be bringing amendments to the table today. These amendments specifically addresses how MHAR can help deal with the challenges of displacement, a multifaceted issue which will require a coordinated solutions across many departments and initiatives.

These amendments also call out home ownership opportunities, which have always been important wealth building tools for Seattle families. I appreciate these proposed changes as they help address issues of displacement and home ownership and keep these at the forefront of our discussions around MHAR and represent important lenses through which we need to view this program.

Amendment discussion aside, I think today’s committee vote is an incredibly important step toward implementing a mandatory affordable housing program. I also believe it’s important that all developers will be a part of the solution by contributing to affordable housing (either in units or in lieu fees), and that, when added to the commercial framework adopted last year, vastly expands the scope of where the program will apply.

Should the legislation pass through committee today, it will be a huge milestone as we work toward our City’s goal to build and/or preserve 20,000 units of affordable housing over the next ten years. Resulting from years of negotiation and compromise, MHAR is one of the most ambitious efforts Seattle has ever undertaken to address our growing need for affordable housing and will have a very real impact on current residents and future generations of Seattleites.


Reflections On the Tragic Events of Last Week

July 12th, 2016

After providing an initial statement to Seattle Weekly, and receiving many emails and phone calls regarding my thoughts on last week’s events, I felt compelled to provide a full, updated statement on last week’s events in Louisiana, Minnesota, and Dallas.

Like many others in our community and around the country I have had difficulty sleeping over the past week as I contemplate our country’s continued cycle of violence.

As a parent of young children, I continually think about how to keep them safe—from crossing the street, to keeping their small hands off stovetops, and even providing a safe home in which to live. But I have never had to think about the threat of police violence towards my children, nor the pain in having to tell them what to do to avoid it.

As parents and community members we must actively engage in conversations about anti-racist work with our children, our neighbors, our friends, and our families. I send my thoughts to the families of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile, as well as to communities of color in Seattle and beyond.

My heart also goes out to the families of the five police officers that were killed last Thursday in Dallas, and I hope for a quick recovery to the seven other officers who were injured. I would like to commend the Dallas Police Department for their efforts in prioritizing the safety of the public and protestors present that evening. To members of the Seattle Police Department, I can’t begin to comprehend what coming to work must feel like after the violence in Dallas – but I do wish for the safety for those that serve our great city.

As we think about the violence that has happened this past week, we must resist the urge to place blame and divide communities, whether they be police officers or those in the #BlackLivesMatter movement. Instead, we must ask ourselves the very personal question of what we can personally do each day to make Seattle a more inclusive and safe place.

It’s important to reiterate today, and every day, that #BlackLivesMatter. It’s also just as important, if not more so, that we come together to reflect and take concrete, actionable steps to ensure that each community, especially Black and Brown communities, feel safe and not in fear of losing their lives whenever they interact with police.

Our City’s next hearing on the Department of Justice’s consent decree on the Seattle Police Department’s use of force and accountability efforts will be held on August 15th. I will be interested to hear what actions council can take to increase police accountability in our city. During upcoming discussions with my fellow Councilmembers, I will be emphasizing increased officer training in use-of-force and de-escalation, increasing local neighborhood representation on our police force, full use of body cameras on every officer, and the permanence of the Community Police Commission.

It is imperative that we expedite this process to assure our residents that recent violent incidents like those that have happened in Louisiana, Minnesota, and Dallas, as well as in Seattle, are not repeated – and that we can renew our efforts to bring trust and safety to all. We must continue to engage in far-reaching, daring conversations with our families, our communities, and our city and take action for a more just world.



June 29th, 2016

Today, media outlets across our region are focusing on homelessness (explore #SeaHomeless). I wanted to highlight the significance of that coordination and add a bit about what our office is doing to help make homelessness rare, brief, and one time.

Recently, I attended a walking tour in the Central District; what began as a discussion with neighbors on the topic of gun violence, zoning changes, and business improvement areas turned into an unanticipated window into the lives of residents in our city experiencing homelessness. As the group walked past an encampment in the Central District, an encampment representative came out, alarmed that we had intentions of asking them to leave. Respecting this response, the walking tour group continued, but I stayed behind and ended up sitting for an hour with encampment residents talking about policies and solutions to ending homelessness.

During my visit, I met a couple who was 9 months and 1 day pregnant – not usually the image most people conjure when they think of homeless individuals. This couple embodied something I’ve seen keenly since stepping into my new role as a Councilmember: that the issue of homelessness so very quickly becomes humanized – every single person has a unique and important story to tell.  This isn’t new of course: Real Change, SKCCH, Facing Homelessness, and dozens of other great organizations have been doing this work for a long time.

Personifying the 4,505 unsheltered people and families found in our 2016 One Night Count (and realizing that is a 19% increase from the previous year) should compel all of us to act. Recognizing that more than 35,000 students in Washington were homeless at some point last year – and nearly 3,000 of those students were from the Seattle School District – demands response. Everyone has the right to basic human decency in our city; whether or not they live in a sanctioned or unsanctioned encampment, people absolutely need to have access to clean water, a place to go to the bathroom, trash pickup, and shelter from the elements (ideally, a roof over their heads). Our homeless students need a place to live so they can be focused on school, not shelter. When faced with these statistics and personal stories one can’t help but feel motivated to take action to create change.

Just a few weeks ago, I joined Michael Ramos of the Church Council of Greater Seattle to convene a group of leaders from the faith organizations in my district (4) to talk about homelessness. Over the course of our conversation, we celebrated the wonderful efforts already happening to serve our community (such as the Elizabeth Gregory Home, Roots, and Teen Feed – just to name a few), and discussed the resources needed to increase efforts. Together, this group set a goal of finding 100 new beds or safe places to sleep in Northeast Seattle before winter of 2016 and have already started mobilizing city and non-profit resources to meet this goal.  We believe we’re already 20% of the way toward that goal in only two weeks.

It’s not nearly enough, but we hope that by demonstrating small successes we can help build a larger public response.  I’m urging all of us to take the state of emergency to heart.  If you can help us in this effort to find additional shelter beds, safe car camping locations, or 24/7 shelter options, please email Geri Morris from my office so we can connect you with city resources and support.

Seattle can be a place where all families can thrive.  We must continue our efforts to increase and preserve affordable housing in our communities.  We must continue to diversify our shelter options to meet the needs of families, couples, people with pets, and more.  We must continue our focus on outcomes, not processes.  Seattle can be a place where all people can live with dignity in safe, healthy, and affordable homes.

I hope you’ll join us in this effort.


Improved ST3 Plan Announced

May 26th, 2016

As a daily transit rider I feel a strong responsibility to ensure that the decisions we make on the Sound Transit board will be in the best interests of our current and future riders. To that end, I am incredibly proud of the work that our staff and board have accomplished with our updated Sound Transit 3 plan. Through rigorous financial analysis from both within the agency and from leading financial experts, we’ve been able to modestly increase the bonding capacity by approximately 8 percent, or $4 billion. We’ve leveraged that bonding capacity to respond to the public request to deliver more projects, and to deliver projects more quickly.

When we asked the public for feedback, we heard many things, including that the draft plan took too long to deliver important projects, especially the added lines to Ballard and West Seattle. And we heard that infill stations like the 130th St. and Graham St. stations needed to be permanent, not provisional, and needed to be delivered faster. With that feedback, here is how we are going to use this $4 billion in bonding capacity to improve upon the Sound Transit 3 draft plan.

First, additional funding allows us to speed up the delivery of new lines to Ballard and West Seattle. The Ballard line, originally scheduled for delivery in 22 years, will now be completed in 19 years. The West Seattle line, originally expected in 17 years, is now scheduled for completion in 14 years. We’re building the Graham St., Boeing Access Road, and 130th St. stations as part of the ST3 plan in year 15.  We’ve also increased funding in early years to help Ballard, Capitol/First Hill, and West Seattle bus riders have more frequent and reliable bus service.

In addition to the projects and timelines released today, Sound Transit’s staff and board are still working on important policy language to be included in the final plan including statements and principles on transit oriented development, project delivery, and station access amongst other issues. In collaboration with my colleagues on the City Council, I worked to pass a resolution earlier this week which outlined Seattle’s project and policy priorities for ST3 and included a commitment from the city of Seattle to continue to work with Sound Transit on ways we can collaborate on permitting, alignment/station location preferences, and project delivery.

I also want to be clear that while the size of this package is increasing from $50 billion to $54 billion, the tax burden is unchanged. This additional funding does not come from new taxes, but rather from improved financial leveraging of Sound Transit’s debt capacity. The recently completed financial work confirmed the feasibility of moving up and modestly increasing the issuance of bonds while remaining fully consistent with the agency’s conservative debt policies, maintaining the agency’s current high ratings and minimizing borrowing costs to taxpayers. The updated results have been verified by three separate financial teams; Sound Transit’s investment banking team, PB Consulting, and Ben Porter & Associates.

Sound Transit 3 will dramatically improve mobility across our region and help us keep up with our rapid population and employment growth. With these critical investments, I believe that the Sound Transit 3 plan represents a huge opportunity to expand access to reliable, high speed transit, while creating tens of thousands of jobs and making our region more affordable. These investments will open doors of opportunity, improve equity, and advance regional connectivity for generations to come.


Let’s Talk About Road Safety

May 16th, 2016

I was upset to learn about the two bicycle-car collisions in District 4 last week – one along NE 65th Street and the other along 20th Ave NE. First and foremost, I wish a quick and healthy recovery to the bike riders who were both transported to Harborview as a result of their respective accidents.  It is clear that critical road safety improvements need to be made quickly across our city to ensure street safety for all – no matter your age, ability, or mode of transportation.

This is now the second serious bike collision on NE 65th Street within one year; with last year’s death and the two current bike riders in critical condition, it serves as a terrible reminder that safety improvements along this arterial are far past due. As I stated last year on the campaign trail after Andy Hulslander’s death, even my young daughters know that this street is fast and dangerous: they argue over who gets to hold my hand as we walk along NE 65th everyday so they can stay as far away from the street as possible. I also mentioned then that we need to fix NE 65th Street before someone else is killed or seriously injured; we have unfortunately missed that mark and simply can’t continue to have tragedy dictate our neighborhood’s safety improvement investments.

My vision to address these safety concerns is to install a fully protected bike lane on 65th Street, along the entire length from Magnuson to Greenlake, connecting projects that already exist or are in development, such as Ravenna Boulevard, Roosevelt Way, the 39th Ave NE Neighborhood Greenway, and Burke Gilman Trail. At the very least, we should install Protected Bike Lanes, from Ravenna to 20th Ave NE along NE 65th Street (as well as the two planned Neighborhood Greenways adjacent to 25th Ave NE that run on 24th Ave NE north of NE 65th Street and on 27th Ave NE south of 65th Street).

Each of these improvements – which could have been a factor in preventing these collisions – can be found in the city’s Bicycle Mater Plan Northeast Sector Map (pdf), but have yet to make it into any revenue dedicated plans such as the “2016 – 2020 Implementation Plan” or the Move Seattle Levy. We need to begin making concrete steps towards Seattle’s vision for a fully connected, safe cycle network and I will work to ensure that we find the funds to move these improvements up the list of priorities.

At this Tuesday’s Sustainability and Transportation Committee meeting, SDOT will be coming in to talk about the Bike Master Plan. I plan on vocalizing my own concerns that were highlighted by the two collisions last week – and would encourage residents from District 4 and across the city to do the same through public testimony.

These incidents bring to the fore the necessary urgency of our actions to make our city streets safer for all users, and we must emphasize investments in critical road safety projects to prevent the next tragedy from occurring.



Why Investing in Bike-Share Matters

March 1st, 2016

I have received many messages from constituents both urging me to refrain from ‘bailing out’ Pronto, as well as to save our city’s bike-share program. And while I want to confirm that I take all communications I receive to heart, I also want to widen the narrow scope through which this issue is being viewed and explain why I am choosing to support Pronto.

Based on the issues Pronto encountered during their startup phase, many have made the assumption that this decision is an easy one – ‘why spend money on a sinking ship?’ However, the fact that is not as widely known is that at the end of the day, Seattle City Council will spend at least $1 million dollars no matter the decision: either we spend $1.4M to acquire Pronto’s assets – and hold significant leverage on what an expansion of bike-share would encompass – OR we let Pronto fail and repay a $1M Federal Grant contingent upon Pronto’s active operations.

Many argue that we shouldn’t subsidize Pronto, but governments at all levels subsidize nearly all other means of transportation, including cars, buses, trains, and airplanes. Others argue that the private market could meet our bike-share needs on its own, as it does in cities like New York, Miami Beach, and San Francisco. Private programs however, are often concentrated in small, tourist-driven geographic areas – meaning city residents, especially those in low-income areas, do not have access. Bike-share and associated infrastructure should not be relegated to an attraction for cycle-inclined tourists; this is an investment to increase the transportation choices this city offers to residents.

With our recent investment in multi-modal infrastructure with the Move Seattle levy, we have the opportunity to sustain a safe, reliable, and healthy mode of transportation to utilize our investments – all for roughly $400K, or what King County Metro spends in about 2.5 hours. Pronto’s revenues from ridership and advertisements are nearly breakeven, and a recent survey of Pronto members indicated a need for more stations, higher station density, and a larger geo-footprint – the exact factors that are seen in the nation’s most successful bike share models. Is $400K a worthy investment to ensure bike-share is a key component of our long-term transportation plans as a city? The answer in my opinion is a definitive yes.

Carbon-based transportation is the single largest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and bike-share represents an essential program helping Seattle meet its goal of becoming carbon-neutral by 2050. Investing in Pronto keeps this mode of transportation available to users (a base we feel confident will grow), instills confidence in a Seattle bike share system, and allows future efforts for other Seattle-based bike-share program (public or private) to qualify for critical grants and other investments.

My vision is for Pronto is to become a system that better connects existing transit infrastructure (including light rail stations set to open this month), serves residents outside of the downtown core, offers those who need it a low-income fare, has the opportunity to flatten out the city with the acquisition of electric bikes, and has the potential to connect with ORCA transit cards.

To me, the choice is clear – let’s make a modest investment that will go a long way towards meeting our goals as a city; one with equitable access to environmentally friendly bike infrastructure that serves the transportation needs of residents desperate for options to get out of gridlock.


My personal and professional worlds collide

February 18th, 2016

My urban planning background means I end up having a lot of discussions and strategy sessions with friends and colleagues around built environment, transportation, and density. But it also inspires me to get involved with related considerations such as the recent issue around Seattle Public School capacity. The recent discussion by Seattle Public Schools to annex seven on-site preschool or child care locations to make room for new K-3 homerooms was a great case of my personal and professional worlds colliding. As a dad of future SPS students, a city councilmember, and the chair of the planning committee, I felt we should be engaging with the school district to ensure that we protected as many on-site child care providers as possible, and if we couldn’t find space inside the school, that we should be looking at nearby city and non-profit locations as possible homes for child care providers.

I believe that we need our city’s education system to keep pace with the growing number of people who call Seattle home. We need ensure that each student has a seat in a classroom, and that their families have the option of before or aftercare programs that not only serves the needs of working families, but programs that provide well-rounded opportunities for their children. Seattle’s growth is not projected to slow down any time soon, so ultimately we need long term solutions and better data to help the accuracy of the enrollment projections so that we don’t continue to face capacity issues with farther reaching ramifications.

I know that there are many people who have been working on solving the capacity dilemma but I strongly believe that the right answers can only come from a coordinated, creative, and forward thinking approach. Since our first week in office, my staff and I have been engaged in many conversations to help come up with solutions – we’ve been talking with child care providers about the type of holistic care they want to offer kids in their programs, with the school district about how they build their models to project student enrollment, with members of the School Board about how they want to ensure that families voices are heard throughout the process, and with Seattle’s Department of Education and Early Learning about their commitment to convene the right players to come up with solutions.

And while it is clear to me that this issue is a complex one, it’s the three girls who greet me when I get home from work every day inspire me to be a voice at this table – not to find a band aide of a short term solution, but to help build models that can help achieve smart, coordinated growth for the long term so that the students of Seattle and their families can be confident that their city and their school system will grow proportionally with the neighborhoods around them.

I feel direct ownership of these solutions both because I’m a parent and because many of the technical elements required fix our capacity problems fall under the umbrella of my Planning, Land Use and Zoning committee . We’ve been working on this issue for several weeks now; there’s more to come on that front soon, and we’re very much looking forward to being part of Mayor Murray’s education summit this spring to elevate the capacity discussion and put it in a broader context. Part of this summit will involve community conversations during the month of March and we will share more details once we have them in hopes that you’ll join us in participating. Ultimately, creating a family friendly city has always been at the top of my list and that all starts with having great schools.


© 1995-2016 City of Seattle